NodeValid

Published video-model weights, licences and hardware notes

LongCat-Video names no card and no figure

The repository states 13.6B parameters and 720p at 30fps. It states no memory figure and names no card, so the hardware column for this release is empty in both of the ways it can be. As of 2026-09-22.

LongCat-Video in the hardware column, as publishedA release can publish a count and an output size and still leave a reader unable to tell whether their own machine is anywhere near enough.The memory statement as publishedNo memory figure recordedThe repository states none and names no card720pStated with a 30fps frame rateNo ceiling recordedDescribed as minutes-long, with no figure attachedNeither a figure nor a card
Fig. 1 Two columns filled, one column silent, and the silent one is the one people ask about.
What the repositories actually stateFilled where the repository states something, hollow where it does not. A blank is not an inference.What the repositories actually stateWhat the pages stateWhat the pagesstateHardware, in the vendor's own wordsHardware, in the vendor's own words — What the pages state: No memory figure recordedThe detail published beside itThe detail published beside it — What the pages state: The repository states none and names no cardResolution, from the same pagesResolution, from the same pages — What the pages state: 720pLength, from the same pagesLength, from the same pages — What the pages state: No ceiling recorded
Fig. 2 Filled where the repository states something, hollow where it does not. A blank is not an inference.
LongCat-Video in the hardware column, with the columns that qualify it. Read from github.com/meituan-longcat on 2026-09-22.
ColumnWhat the pages state
Hardware, in the vendor's own wordsNo memory figure recorded
The detail published beside itThe repository states none and names no card
Resolution, from the same pages720p
Length, from the same pagesNo ceiling recorded

Inclusion rule. The value this page is about, the detail the vendor attached to it, and the two columns that change how it should be read. A column the vendor left empty keeps its row and says so. Order. This column first, then its detail, then the two columns that qualify it.

1The cheapest column to fill was left empty

A memory figure costs one run and one sentence. This repository published a count and a frame rate, which suggests the information existed and was not thought worth writing down.

That is common in research releases and it is the single most requested missing value in this register. It is recorded as missing rather than approximated.

2Why the count does not substitute

Another release with a nearly identical count, 13B, states a 6GB minimum. A third states thirty billion parameters and needs over seventy gigabytes. The count is not a proxy for the requirement.

So a reader cannot place this release on the hardware ladder at all. It has a size and an output and no position between the 6GB row and the 78GB row.

3The length claim has the same shape

The repository describes output as minutes-long with no figure attached, so the length column is a description rather than a value. Two of the five columns here are qualitative.

Between them they make this the least checkable entry in the register, which is worth a page precisely because everything else about the release is stated plainly.

4Sources

Every figure above is the vendor's own, taken from github.com/meituan-longcat on 2026-09-22 with nothing measured here. The rest of the release is on its family entry, the whole column is on hardware, and all memory figures together are on requirements. Nearby: A 4090 and 80GB, No minimum stated.