Apache 2.0 on both, and it settles less than it seems
Both published weight releases in this register are Apache 2.0. A permissive licence on both means the licence column cannot distinguish them, and the question that does is which version the weights correspond to. As of 2026-09-12.
| Item | What is published | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Wan | Apache 2.0 | Stated in the repository |
| LTX-Video | Apache 2.0 | Stated in the repository |
| The distinguishing field | Which version is published | Not the licence |
Inclusion rule. Licences stated in the vendor's own repository. A licence named in press coverage is not recorded. Order. The two published families first, then the field that separates them.
1A permissive licence answers the legal question and not the practical one
Apache 2.0 settles whether weights can be used commercially, modified and redistributed. It says nothing about whether the published version is the one anybody is actually selling, which is the question a team comparing a local deployment against an API needs answered.
Both entries here clear the licence bar identically. Everything that differentiates them sits in the other columns, and a reader who stops at the licence has learned the least discriminating fact on the page.
2Same licence, different publishing behaviour
One vendor publishes weights for two earlier generations while selling a newer one. The other publishes an open model under one name and sells a differently named product. Both are consistent with Apache 2.0 and they are quite different positions for a buyer.
The register keeps licence and version as separate columns because they move independently, and because the licence is the field most likely to be quoted on its own.
3What a licence cannot tell you about support
Permissive terms carry no obligation to keep publishing, to document, or to answer anything. A repository can go quiet while the licence on the last release stays valid forever, and the weights already downloaded keep working.
That is a real form of durability and it is worth saying plainly: an open release is not maintained because it is open, it is merely still usable.
- LicenceApache 2.0stated in the repository
- LicenceApache 2.0stated in the repository
4Sources
Repository statements and hosted rates are linked from the model pages and the how read page, checked 2026-09-12. Hardware figures are set out on requirements. Nearby: Which version, Running it locally, 4090 or 80GB.