Hosted services measured against their own open releases
These entries cover the two-track case: a vendor that publishes weights and also sells a hosted service, where the hosted version is not the version in the repository. As of 2026-09-12.
The arrangement is entirely reasonable and rarely stated plainly. Running inference costs money, so the current generation stays behind an interface while an older one is released to build goodwill and an ecosystem.
The consequence for a buyer is concrete. Benchmarks published against the hosted version do not describe the downloadable one, and a team that plans a self-hosted pipeline from a demo of the service is planning against different weights.
Each entry records what the vendor says about the relationship between the two, which is often nothing at all. Where a version number appears on one side and not the other, that asymmetry is the entry.
1The services
- LTX Studio — The model version LTX Studio sells by the second, whether weights for it are published, and which releases in the same family are open.
- SceneMixer — The model version SceneMixer sells by the second, whether weights for it are published, and which releases in the same family are open.
An entry is opened when the same vendor both publishes weights and sells access to a model under a related name.
Also in the register: Models, Questions, Learn, Data. What a release has to publish is set out on the reading page.